top of page

Finland's Next Talent War Will Not Be About Talent

2 days ago
4 min read

Finland has a strange talent problem.


It is a bit like buying very expensive ingredients and then using half of it.


We keep talking about attracting international talent as if talent itself were the scarce resource. But look at what is already happening.


One in ten employed people in Finland is now of foreign origin. That share has more than doubled since 2010.


In 2025, another 51 121 people immigrated to Finland, and Finland's population would actually have shrunk without immigration: there were 13 377 more deaths than births in 2025.


So international talent is not some future workforce we are preparing for. It is already here. The more interesting question is what Finland does with it, and this is where the numbers become slightly weird.


Finland can import a degree and somehow lose it at customs.


Not literally, obviously.


But consider this:

Among university-educated employees, 12% of people with a foreign background were working in worker occupations in 2024.


For Finnish-background employees with the same level of education? 

3%.


That is a fourfold difference.


So somewhere between - We need international experts! and Welcome to Finland!, we occasionally arrive at: Excellent master's degree. Have you considered a job that does not require it?


That is not primarily a talent shortage. That is a talent utilization problem, and it gets more interesting.


Finland is quite good at getting the first date.


According to the OECD, Finland actually performs fairly well as a destination for highly educated international workers. Quality of life, skills and conditions for families are among our strengths. But ETLA followed foreign professionals after they arrived.

Within five years, around half had left Finland. That is quite a plot twist.


Imagine a company proudly announcing that they recruited 100 brilliant people and five years later adding quietly that out of those 100 they have 50 people left.


Nobody would call the recruitment campaign an unquestionable success. Yet at country level, we often separate those two numbers.


We count arrivals as one conversation. Departures as another. Employment as another. Integration as another. But to the person living it, it is one story.


And Finnish companies are already splitting into two camps.


A 2025 Business Finland study found something especially interesting. Companies using international talent appear to be polarising. Some are becoming increasingly international and others are moving in the opposite direction.


Companies hiring international employees tended to grow faster than those that did not. Among companies using international talent, 49% said it had contributed to growth. In ICT, the figure was 60%.


The most interesting part is that companies still mainly recruit internationally because they need labour or specific expertise. They much less often use international talent to access new markets or new ideas, exactly where Business Finland says some of the greatest growth potential sits.


In other words:


We sometimes hire a Brazilian, Indian or German professional and then mainly celebrate that they filled a Finnish vacancy.


That is like buying a Swiss Army knife and proudly using the bottle opener.

Useful but perhaps not the whole point.


Which changes what integration means for companies.


For years, integration has sounded like something the international employee needs to do.


Learn Finnish, understand Finland, build networks, adapt, integrate. But perhaps there is another side to that word that HR should be thinking about.


Can the organization integrate international talent into the organization itself?

Into decision-making, leadership, customer understanding, professional networks, innovation, into careers that continue moving upwards after the first international hire.


There is a huge difference between having international employees and being an international organization. One is a demographic fact. The other is an organizational capability.


Finland cannot really afford to waste the difference.


Finland's demographic equation is becoming remarkably simple.

In 2025:


45 832 people were born.


59 209 died.


Yet the population still grew.


Why?


Immigration.


Meanwhile, ETLA's 2026 research concludes that Finland will need immigration in the long run to stabilise its working-age population and support economic growth as the population ages. It also finds that the economic effect depends heavily on something less glamorous than recruitment campaigns - how successfully people are integrated into the economy.


That is why we think Finland's next talent war will not really be about talent.


There is talent. There are international professionals already living here. There are international graduates coming through Finnish universities. There are people still arriving, less but still coming.


The competition will increasingly be about something else:


Who is best at turning talent into contribution?

Who spots skills others overlook?

Who gives international employees room to progress instead of simply room to work?

Who builds workplaces where international recruitment stops being an HR exception and becomes normal business?

Who manages to capture the ideas, networks, languages and perspectives that arrived together with the CV?

Who creates an environment worth staying for?


The companies that figure this out might have a considerable advantage because the next talent war may not be won by whoever searches the furthest. It may be won by whoever wastes the least talent that is already here.

Comments


bottom of page